Workplace Communication

.png)
Written by
Aarohi Parakh,
Psychologist and Content Writer

Reviewed by
Sanjana Sivaram,
Psychologist and Clinical Content Head

Visualise this! You are a mid-level marketing manager in a leading FMCG firm in Gurugram. One of your team members, Piya has just finished an ad campaign that has clearly missed the customer brief. You know she is earnest and capable, but you hesitate. What if she takes it personally? If you remain silent, you risk this happening again and impacting the firm's reputation. In many Indian offices, that conversation rarely happens— feedback is postponed to annual reviews, filtered down, or left ambiguous.
Yet, feedback is what bridges the gap between intention and impact. It is one of the most productive tools for driving workplace improvement. And the stakes are high: 65% of employees say they would be more engaged if they received more feedback, but 40% report rarely getting meaningful feedback. In the Indian context, where hierarchy, indirect communication, and “saving face” are deeply embedded, giving feedback feels especially tricky.
So, it’s no surprise that many managers quietly wonder: “If I say something, will I demotivate them?” But here’s the promise: this guide will show you how to give feedback in a way that is constructive and professional— one that respects cultural sensitivities and empowers people. From frameworks to real-world examples, you’ll get actionable tools for giving effective feedback.
Let’s get back to Piya’s example. The missed brief wasn’t just a creative slip-up — it was a communication gap. As a manager, if you quietly “fix it”, she may never realise what went wrong. But a clear, timely conversation about what worked and what went wrong could turn an error into a learning opportunity. That’s the essence of effective feedback — it fuels growth, confidence, and trust.
Every kind of feedback serves a different purpose. Great managers know when to encourage, when to coach, and when to correct. Let’s break them down:

While how to give feedback is important, when and where to give feedback is equally important.
Sharing feedback while the context is still fresh, ideally closer to the event, can be the most impactful. The timing of the feedback would also largely depend on the learning goals — immediate feedback may help if employees are learning new skills. Still, slightly delayed feedback may be more helpful when applying the learnt skills. In any case, feedback should be avoided during the heat of the moment, as emotions can distort the message.
In Indian workplaces, privacy becomes crucial. Public correction can be misinterpreted as an act of embarrassment.
Sticking to annual performance reviews to provide feedback may no longer be the most effective tool for managers. Employees are 3.6 times more likely to strongly agree that they are motivated to do outstanding work when their manager provides daily (vs. annual) feedback. Short, frequent conversations (monthly 1:1) normalise feedback and would not seem threatening.
Having a structured framework for providing feedback can help managers turn vague comments into clear, actionable guidance for employees. These globally trusted feedback models work well when adapted to Indian teams.
Developed by the Centre for Creative Leadership, it is one of the most widely used frameworks because of its clarity and simplicity. It breaks feedback into three clear parts: situation, behaviour, and impact.
Example: “In yesterday’s client meeting (Situation), you interrupted Meera twice while she was explaining her idea (Behaviour). It made it seem like her input wasn’t valued (Impact).”
This feedback model reduces defensiveness by focusing on facts.
The STAR model is commonly used in interviews but is equally powerful in feedback conversations. It extends the SBI structure by adding the task element, which links a person’s responsibilities to their actions and outcomes. This makes it especially useful when you want employees to understand the bigger picture behind their efforts.
Example: “In last week’s client onboarding session (situation), you were responsible for explaining our compliance process (task). You created a step-by-step visual guide and walked the client through it patiently (action), which built their confidence and reduced follow-up queries by half (result). Great work.”
The Feedback Sandwich is one of the most familiar frameworks, especially in workplaces that value maintaining morale during feedback. It “sandwiches” constructive criticism between two layers of positive feedback. However, its limitation is that employees may see the structure as predictable, leading to a loss of trust. Sometimes, it can also get confusing, and the feedback can get lost. This method should be used with caution.
Example: “Your project documentation was very thorough and well-formatted (positive). However, some technical terms weren’t clearly explained, which confused the new hires (criticism). I know your writing skills are strong, and I’m confident your next version will be even more user-friendly (positive).”
Unlike most feedback frameworks that look backwards, the Feed-Forward model focuses exclusively on the future. The idea is simple: instead of analysing past mistakes, employees should be guided on what they can do differently next time. This approach minimises defensiveness and creates a forward-looking mindset.
Example: Instead of saying, “Your last client pitch lacked clarity,” a manager could say:
“In your next pitch, try using three slides to summarise the key value points. This will help the client focus and improve understanding.”
In Indian teams, where direct confrontation can often be uncomfortable, asking questions to invite reflections can help managers break the ice with employees. It helps create a two-way dialogue, rather than a lecture.
Example: “How did that presentation feel to you? “What would you do differently next time?”
The manager can provide their insights and guidance after listening to the employees, which can serve as a feedback loop.
Receiving feedback may not be easy for employees, and sometimes it may evoke unexpected reactions. Remaining calm at such times is the key for managers. In Indian workplaces, common responses can be in the form of:
When faced with defensiveness or resistance:

By remaining composed and empathetic, managers can turn a tense moment of feedback into an opportunity for growth.
In Indian organisations authority can often be equated with respect. When giving feedback across levels:
How one’s feedback tone is perceived can vary across regions and generations. Younger, metro-based employees may prefer directness. Older or traditional teams may expect softened phrasing.
💡 Tip: Adjust tone, not facts.
In geographically distributed teams, relying solely on text can backfire. Tone can sometimes also sound harsher online. Quick video calls or adding warmth through appreciation first can make all the difference.
Example: “Thanks for sending the deck — good effort on structure. Let’s refine the visuals a bit before the client meeting.”
Below mentioned feedback examples can serve as an actionable guide for managers:


A self-evaluation checklist before giving feedback, can help individuals be better prepared.
If answer to any of the above questions is “no,” pause and prepare again. Feedback delivered thoughtfully is half the battle won!
Follow-up to any feedback is as important as the feedback itself. The below essential points should be kept in mind:

Even well-intentioned managers can miss the mark when giving feedback. Here are some common feedback pitfalls and how to turn them into constructive conversations that build trust and performance:
Use respectful, collaborative language. Focus on shared goals rather than hierarchy — for example, “Can we explore another approach that might align better with the client brief?” Keep the tone solution-oriented, not corrective.
Stay calm and empathetic. Pause the discussion if needed, acknowledge their feelings (“I can see this is difficult to hear”), and revisit the feedback later when they’re ready. The aim is to support, not overwhelm.
Try to utilise video call over text whenever possible. Begin by appreciating the person’s effort, be specific about what can improve, and end with next steps. Written feedback should always be clear, structured, and free from emotional tone.
Document your conversations and provide concrete timelines for improvement. Offer additional support or training if needed. If performance still doesn’t improve, escalate formally — but only after consistent, fair feedback attempts.
Absolutely yes. Early feedback helps new hires adjust faster. Keep it encouraging and frame it as guidance rather than a lecture— “Here’s what’s working well and what you can focus on next.” It builds confidence and sets clear expectations.
Giving feedback is both an art and a responsibility. It’s not about pointing out flaws — it’s about helping someone see their potential, identify their areas of improvement, with respect and care. In the Indian workplace, where harmony often matters as much as performance, this balance is crucial.
When feedback becomes part of everyday conversation — not an annual event — teams grow stronger, employees feel valued, and managers become true mentors.
So next time you hesitate before saying, “Can I give you some feedback?” — remember: it’s not confrontation, it’s collaboration.
What’s Inside:
✅ Ready-to-use feedback scripts for real workplace scenarios
✅ A 1:1 check-in guide to make conversations smoother
✅ A monthly feedback calendar to help track progress and goals
💡 Why You’ll Love It:
Built for Indian managers, this toolkit bridges the gap between intent and impact — helping you give feedback that builds trust, clarity, and confidence.
📥 Download Now → and start building a culture of open communication at work!